Okay das habe ich verstanden, das heisst die Abfrage funktioniert eigentlich aber das lwp error handling erkennt 302 als fehler und bringt ERROR: ?

Oder versteh ich das falsch:


The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. Since the redirection might be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD continue to use the Request-URI for future requests. This response is only cacheable if indicated by a Cache-Control or Expires header field.

The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s).

If the 302 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.

Note: RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 specify that the client is not allowed
to change the method on the redirected request. However, most
existing user agent implementations treat 302 as if it were a 303
response, performing a GET on the Location field-value regardless
of the original request method. The status codes 303 and 307 have
been added for servers that wish to make unambiguously clear which
kind of reaction is expected of the client.



Was anderes zum Poard:

Er zeigt gerad im Index 2 Seiten an, allerdings ist auf seite 2 kein posting, nur ein leeres Textfeld... Wird sich mit diesem Posting sicher ändern aber ich wollts ma gesagt ham :)